top of page
Search

The Labour Party stuffed up the country for six years. Now the Nats have thrown into the "too hard basket" matters like legislation to clarify the Treaty, health-care, and dealing with monopoly power rife across banking, food, air-travel and construction. Somewhere along the line both parties have decided to delegate solving NZ's problems. It's beyond the powers of the PM, Leader of Opposition, Finance Minister & Shadow Finance Minister, combined with their fellow MPs, to come up with useful solutions. So they've asked State Services Commissioner to put out a job advert for a new Chief Executive (or Secretary) of the NZ Treasury, the last one being such a non-entity that barely anyone even knew her name (whoever she was has departed to do auditing back in Australia, from where she came). What is the prospective new NZ Treasury CEO tasked with doing? Nothing less than being a "thought leader" who will "lead & drive the Government’s economic agenda". It gets better. You will be required to rise to "a challenge" that "awaits you" as next Secretary. It is to "turn around NZ’s economy". In order to do so you must be a "change agent".


The pay is the same as former Finance Minister Grant Robertson's as Vice Chancellor of Otago University - around $630,000. Given Robertson's main task is to call up his mates in Wellington to stop Waikato getting a new medical school so Otago can retain its monopoly over training doctors, his VC job may have more going for it, especially if life-style & hanging out again in the student pubs you used to frequent when you were 20 years old is your thing. But if you're on for being Treasury CEO and single-handedly working out why productivity is low in NZ (another job requirement) and "turning around" the nation, then go for the Treasury job. I mean, how hard can solving all NZ problems be and correcting the mistakes of six years of Ardern & Hipkins, and now telling Nicola Willis what to do to make her look good, all whilst the MPs who were voted in to do that job do everything else but?


Sources:

New Zealand citizen, Peter Thiel, who is one of the world's richest men, and business associate of Elon Musk, has had his house application in Wanaka rejected on appeal by the Environment Court. Theil was the first investor in Shane Legg's company, Deep Mind, which started the Artificial Intelligence revolution. Legg is a former student of Rotorua Lakes High School. Theil once expressed huge enthusiasm about doing business in NZ - he loved how we fostered extreme sports in places like Queenstown and were into risk-taking and being different, with a freedom-loving edge, on top of being friendly and easy going at the same time. Not any more. In spite of his house being the most environmentally aware and most inconspicuous house I've ever seen proposed in NZ - it even has grass on the roof - unlike the typical Queenstown monstrosities and ugly junk that constitute Christchurch's skyline, an Environmental Court Judge called Prudence Steven has told him to go jump in Lake Wanaka. It has been reported he will not be lodging an appeal. Of course, libertarian Theil will vote with his feet. Rather than making NZ a tech and AI hub with the likes of his mates Elon Musk and Shane Legg, those guys will not involve NZ in their plans since our red-tape obsessed, small minded officials have made our country more trouble than its worth. Judge Prudence just cost NZ a new industry, being on the frontier of new technologies, higher productivity growth and the ability to eliminate poverty that comes with it. So I guess we're talking maybe a trillion dollars, all up. Oh, and her Court also cost us the ability to play a significant role in terms of inventing new technologies, including alternative green energy sources that will stop climate change. How ironic that Theil got rejected by Prudence, whose name reflects everything he stands against. Excessive prudence is what is holding us back.


Sources:



Home: Blog2

SUBSCRIBE

Thanks for submitting!

CONTACT

Robert MacCulloch

bottom of page