top of page
Search

Yesterday there was a commotion about the unexpected cut in interest rates by the Reserve Bank. It marked a departure from the Bank’s statements a few months ago in May, when it raised the possibility of further hikes. Infometrics Chief Brad Olsen had previously said “heads should roll” if a cut happened this week, given the economy had progressed much as the Reserve Bank was expecting when it forecast no cut until 2025. So when a cut was delivered this week, Olsen accused the Bank of the ‘biggest flip-flop ever’. In response to a question along these lines by Parliament's Finance & Expenditure Committee, Governor bristled at the accusation. “I can’t give air time to that comment,” he said. “No, well it’s just wrong, that’s why [I won’t comment]. So I won’t bother .. there’s no U-turn. I will quote [the Bank’s July comments]: ‘The extent of this restraint will be tempered over time consistent with expected declines in inflation pressures’ .. If people can’t understand what that means, I’m not sure if they should be commentating,” he concluded.


There's a simple way to prove whether Orr misled us, or whether it's Olsen who should pipe down as a "commentator", being incapable of "understanding" what anything "means", to quote the Governor. If the OCR cut was "consistent" with what the market had "expected", as Orr said, there would have been no reaction in exchange rates when it was announced. But there was a reaction - a big one. There was a dramatic fall, shown in the NZD-USD exchange rate graph below, at the exact time at 2pm on 14 August when the OCR was cut:


Bloomberg news reported that "NZ’s central bank cut interest rates, embarking on an easing cycle much sooner than previously indicated". The NZ Herald referred to the cut as a "surprise". The RBNZ Governor's interpretation of this reaction is that our MPs, the Kiwi public and the world, not just Olsen, are ignorant & incapable of "understanding what [he] means". We're all idiots, apart from him. How a Central Bank Governor can be disparaging about the intelligence of the people of a nation & keep his job beggars belief. He told us he was "engineering a recession" - turns out he was wrong on that count also. He's engineered three recessions and caused untold hardship. He engineered our high inflation by printing $50 billion of cash. He swore inflation would not follow, telling Bloomberg "stagflation" was a thing of the past: "The fear of the 70s, the 80s, stagflation, it is such a different world [now]", he said. Everything he's predicted, he's predicted wrong. Everything he's done, he's done it wrong. How long can NZ endure this madness?



New Zealand is the only country in the world I know of in the midst of what is now shaping up to be a "triple dip recession". GDP growth forecasts have been downgraded. Our GDP is now expected to barely change in 2024 - only by about +0.2% and to drop by -0.4% next year. By comparison, Global Economic Growth is running at 3.2% this year, and is expected to rise to 3.3% next year. The latest updated GDP growth numbers put NZ at around 183th position out of 190 nations, one of the slowest growing on the planet. Below us in 2024 are Yemen at -1% (in civil war), Estonia at -0.5%, Haiti at -3% (in civil war), Puerto Rico at -0.2%, Sudan at -4.2% (in civil war), Kuwait at -1.4% & Argentina at -6%. How did it happen? The Reserve Bank stuffed up monetary policy on an industrial scale. It went berserk printing money from 2020 to 2022; then went berserk reversing itself and hiking rates in a scorched earth blitzkrieg until yesterday, over-reacting every time. Yet if you read the Monetary Policy Statement it just released, its sleazy, mealy-mouthed, deceptive commentary, using weasel words at every opportunity, makes it look like it has been doing a fine job, and that nearly every other country is experiencing the same issues. That's a flat-out lie.


Take for example, these lines in its August 2024 Monetary Policy Statement: "Global growth remains below trend across advanced economies". Note the underhand "below trend" sneakily inserted. In fact, global growth is far outstripping NZ and no economist even knows exactly what is "trend" line growth since calculating trends is subject to huge statistical debates. The RBNZ slings off at China, saying its "Growth has been softer than expected, due to a depressed property market & weak consumer demand". China is growing at 5%, leaving us in its wake. The Reserve Bank then puts down the US economy with more weasel words, saying it shows "emerging weakness" and there's "nervousness about US economic prospects". The US has been booming, at just under 3% GDP growth. Since Covid broke at the start of 2020 until now, its share-market is up 37%. NZ's stocks have barely changed, on average - up a tiny 4% over that 4-5 year period and down big-time in real terms (accounting for inflation). For many of our biggest companies, its carnage: Air NZ is down around 70% since the start of 2020, Fletcher Building down 40%, the Warehouse down over 50%, Ryman Healthcare 70% down, and even monopoly Auckland Airport down nearly 15%.


Why can't the RBNZ call a spade a spade? Why twist the truth in ways that would even make a Propaganda Chief of a Third World Dictatorship blush with embarrassment?


Home: Blog2

SUBSCRIBE

Thanks for submitting!

CONTACT

Robert MacCulloch

bottom of page